Quality assurance ensures that a software product or application that is being built is attuned to the quality and functional-specific requirements of an organization. Similarly, Expériences Performance V Capsules testing ensures that a software product or application that is being built is attuned to the performance specific requirements of an organization.

In this article, you will get to know which of the above mentioned two testing methods is better. Though, both of these testing methods play a coherent role in the software development process.

What is Quality Assurance (QA)?

It is an organized process of ascertaining whether a service or product meets the expected quality requirements. Specific requirements are established and maintained by QA for the purpose of developing or manufacturing reliable products. The company’s credibility and customer confidence are increased by QA systems, while also taking into consideration work processes and efficiency.

Quality Assurance or QA testing determines whether the software meets the specific quality standards. Software quality assurance involves evaluating the software based on functionality, performance, usability, security, etc. QA testing also involves checking the quality of the process used to develop, test, and release the software. Thus, QA is an integral part of quality management focused on providing confidence internally to business managers and stakeholders and externally to customers, government agencies, regulators, and third parties.

What is performance testing?

It is a testing method that evaluates the system’s or application’s performance under varying workloads. During the testing process, monitoring of system components is done so that the stability of the system under test can be properly verified.

Performance standards are built for the design, implementation and architecture of a system. Scalability, speed, stability and reliability are some of the key attributes of performance tests.

Which is better: QA or performance testing?

Depending on the project scope, any of the testing methods might be better than the other one. But, it is generally considered that both play an important role in the software development and testing process. This is because any software product or application that lacks in performance or quality will not be able to make a mark for itself in the marketplace.

Following is a detailed explanation of QA and performance testing to provide you with more clarity:

Quality Assurance (QA): It is a testing method that evaluates whether a software product or application meets quality requirements or not. The quality of the software product or application is thoroughly analyzed using this testing method. Quality assurance companies set certain standard procedures for ensuring product quality and help in outsourcing quality assurance by delivering consistent results.

As a result, the QA service provider can make sure that its production and development processes are able to get the required results by meeting specific quality benchmarks. QA ensures that procedures and standards are properly met and that the software product or application meets certain specific quality standards before it is released.

Another significant difference is that the software quality assurance team or the software quality analysts focus on implementing quality in the software during its built stage. They even perform quality tests. Whereas the software quality engineers focus on further improving the QA process. They work only after the software quality analysts complete their work and submit QA requirements.

Performance testing: The stability, speed and responsiveness of a software product or application are determined under varying workloads. The performance test is focused on the « how » aspect, which means how the application or software responds under given conditions. How the application will be able to recover itself after it has crashed when the system threshold level has been crossed.

Performance testing is a non-functional software testing method that validates the app’s speed, responsiveness, scalability, and reliability. This load testing method checks if the application performs seamlessly under varying networks, bandwidths, and under varying user loads. Some of the app issues identified with this type of testing are runtime error, optimization issues related to speed, latency, throughput, response times, load balancing, etc.

Following are a few key points that need to be pondered upon:

The software product or application’s response time for several concurrent users

The maximum load of an application or an upper threshold of an application that can be survived

The application’s capacity to handle the maximum number of transactions

The application’s stability

The users’ response time.

So, based on the information provided above, you will get to know the strategic importance of quality assurance and performance testing. In this manner, you can know the role of these testing methods in the software development process.

Performance or load testing is an important non-functional type of testing and involves the process by which software or an application is tested to know its current system performance.

This sort of testing checks how your current system performs in terms of responsiveness and stability when tested under varying workload conditions. Significantly, the system is tested under multiple and different load and network conditions and this testing process effectively checks the time taken by the system to respond under these different loads.

Conclusion: If you are looking forward to implementing performance testing or QA testing for your specific project, then do get connected with a premium software testing services company that is in line with your project specific requirements.

I am a technical content writer focused on writing technology specific articles. I strive to provide well-researched information on the leading market savvy technologies. In this article, you will get to know which of the above mentioned two testing methods is better. Though, both of perfromance testing and QA testing play a coherent role in the software development process.